Public-Source Fraud Intelligence — Local, State, Federal
Fraud intelligence across eight sectors.
Discover high-probability fraud leads. Score the ones you’re already investigating. All from structured public-source records, with evidence chains attached.
Public-source. Human-reviewed. Evidence-traceable.
$1.1T+
tracked exposure
8.9M
entities scored
173K
curated leads
$25B+
in curated leads
$5.6B+
Platinum tier
50
states covered
Monetary figures represent program exposure (PPP / EIDL loans, claim values, billed amounts, settlements) — not adjudicated fraud.
Two Ways To Use It
Discover. Or verify.
Find new fraud leads
Tier-ranked, evidence-traced cases ready for review. Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze.
For: qui-tam attorneys, federal & state investigators, program-integrity teams.
Score the ones you’re already chasing
Bring an entity. Get a Sentinel Score 0–100 with the contributing signals. Watch / Limited / Low / Unknown bands surface what to deprioritize.
For: compliance & risk teams triaging suspect lists.
Try a free lookup →
What We Do
Map control. Surface risk. Cite the source.
Entity & control mapping
Officer roles, registered agents, address overlaps — the structures that hide control behind clean names.
Exclusion cross-referencing
OIG-LEIE, SAM.gov, state Medicaid, SBA do-not-pay, UI / WC fraud bureaus, HUD enforcement — checked across all 8 sectors.
Evidence-traceable findings
Every observation links to a specific record. Nothing inferred without attribution.
Review-grade reporting
Structured for attorneys, investigators, and compliance officers. Confidence-rated, not speculative.
Court & news validation
Daily cross-reference against federal court records and DOJ enforcement news to validate findings and surface net-new discoveries.
Continuous refresh
Daily ingest, rescore, recheck. A living engine, not a static report.
Sample Dossier
What an investigator-ready report looks like
A redacted preview of a real Investigation Memo. Sensitive fields masked; structure and depth are exactly what subscribers receive.
Every dossier includes
- ✓Personalized header
Subscriber name, report ID, watermark
- ✓Subject profile + Sentinel Score
Identity, NPI, state, scoring breakdown
- ✓Narrative analysis
Plain-English explanation of what the data shows
- ✓Proof ladder
Evidence checklist — confirmed and pending items
- ✓Open questions
What still warrants analyst review
- ✓Recommended next step
Path for review, escalation, or referral
Try it yourself. Browse 1,000+ real masked leads from the live graph. Click any row to generate a sample report.
Explore the live sample dataCONFIDENTIAL MATTER SUMMARY
CLASSIFICATION: PRELIMINARY
Investigation Memo
Subject
Em****ld Med****l C****r LLC
NPI ******4821 · FL · corporate_sanction_match
Narrative
Subject Em****ld Med****l C****r LLC (NPI ******4821) was identified by cross-referencing the █████████ exclusion list against active Medicare enrollment data from █████████. Match: corporate name exact, confidence sufficient for human review.
Registered FL, currently active despite the exclusion. ████████████████████████ — billing activity may continue. Federal court records confirm a related case filed in █████████ District Court on █████████.
Proof ladder
Open questions
- Full ownership chain through state filings: █████████
- Related entities at the same registered address: █████████
- Historical enrollment changes: █████████
Subscribe to unmask the redacted fields and access the full dossier.
Sample report; sensitive fields shown as █. Subscribers receive unredacted versions.
Investigation Memo (Tier 2) — sample healthcare dossier. Same template applies across all eight sectors.
Why It Matters
Control is the signal standard screening misses
Hidden in plain sight
Excluded actors operate through family members, associates, and layered LLCs. Name screening doesn’t catch it.
Costly when missed
Continued billing or grant-receiving by excluded individuals can trigger False Claims Act exposure for payers, lenders, and contractors downstream.
Hard to assemble manually
Tracing control across filings, licensing, property records, and enforcement is slow and error-prone. SentinelGraph automates assembly; humans validate.
Process
From public records to review-grade intelligence
Ingest
Public records: exclusion lists, filings, licensing, courts, property, enforcement.
Resolve
Match individuals and organizations across sources by name, address, license, role.
Map control
Surface officer ties, registered-agent overlap, address clustering — the structures of hidden control.
Review
Human analyst checks every finding before delivery. Confidence, citations, recommended next step.
Validate
Daily cross-reference against federal court records and DOJ news. Validated catches prove the system.
Why SentinelGraph
What makes us different
Control-focused, not name-based
Most screening checks names. We map the structures that show whether an excluded individual still controls.
Evidence-traceable, not black-box
Every finding cites a public source. Reviewable, defensible, suitable for legal use.
Built for professional workflows
Structured findings for investigations, audits, and briefings — not raw data feeds.
Public-source by design
Lawful sources only. Methodology transparent. Findings independently verifiable.
Example Matters
Patterns we surface
Representative composites — illustrative, not real investigations.
Corporate shell layering (healthcare)
Excluded individual removed as officer. Months later, a new LLC at the same address with a family member as registered agent begins billing Medicaid.
PPP / SBA cross-program rings
Two unrelated LLCs receive PPP loans with the same registered agent and overlapping principals. One principal appears in SAM.gov debarment under a name variant.
UI / workers' comp claimant clusters
Multiple UI claimants share a single residential address that also serves as the corporate registration of a workers' comp claimant employer with audit findings.
Who We Serve
Built for professionals, not dashboards
Qui-tam & FCA Attorneys
Case development for FCA, qui-tam, and exclusion-linked matters across all 8 sectors.
Federal & State Investigators
OIG, DOJ, FBI, AGs, MFCUs, SBA-OIG, HUD-OIG, FEMA-OIG, state UI / WC / SNAP fraud bureaus.
Compliance & Risk Teams
Healthcare orgs, MCOs, PBMs, banks, lenders, insurers, contractors, grantees — counterparty screening that goes beyond name match.
Program-Integrity Stakeholders
Medicaid, Medicare contractors, UI integrity, SBA program officers, FEMA / HUD / SNAP integrity teams.
Methodology
Trust and proof, made explicit
Every finding shows what is known, what is uncertain, and what should happen next. SentinelGraph does not determine fraud, liability, or regulatory violation.
National Coverage
All 50 states. All 8 sectors.
SentinelGraph monitors exclusion-linked control risk across all 50 states, with deep coverage in high-activity regions.
Geographic visualization reflects public-source data coverage. It is not a determination of fraud concentration or prevalence.
$1.1T+
tracked exposure
8.9M
entities scored
173K
curated leads
$25B+
in curated leads
$5.6B+
Platinum tier
50
states
Request a confidential briefing
Compliance, qui-tam, FCA, OIG, fraud bureaus, program integrity — if exclusion- and sanction-linked control risk is your problem, we’d like to talk.
What SentinelGraph is not
Not a law firm; not legal advice
Not a determination of fraud, liability, or regulatory violation
Not a substitute for investigation or legal judgment
Not a consumer screening tool
Not a replacement for qualified professional review
Not infallible — public records can contain errors
Important — accuracy and honest limitations. SentinelGraph aggregates public records and applies algorithmic scoring. Like any data-driven system, it can produce errors: name mismatches, stale records, false matches, missing context, or scoring artifacts. Findings are preliminary observations, not conclusions. Always verify before acting. SentinelGraph is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.
Important disclaimer: SentinelGraph provides structured intelligence based on publicly available data. It does not provide legal advice, conduct investigations, or make determinations of fraud, liability, or regulatory violation. All findings are preliminary, evidence-traceable observations intended to support — not replace — qualified legal, investigative, or compliance review. Use of this service does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional engagement unless separately agreed in writing.